WELCOME TO THE TURKISH ARMENIANS HOME PAGE |
GENOCIDES BY TURKEY'S ARMENIAN GENOCIDE CRITICS
By
Bruce Fein
The Government of Turkey has been assailed by several members of the European
Union, the European Parliament, and various arms of government in the United
states for failing to concede that the 1915-23 treatment of Armenian subjects by
the Ottoman Empire constituted genocide under terms of the Genocide Convention.
One strategy for discouraging such gratuitous insults to history and justice is
to demonstrate that Turkey's accusers have been guilty of the same misconduct
but have staunchly resisted self-condemnations as perpetrators of genocide, in
other words, they are applying a double and hypocritical legal standard for the
crime of genocide.
This essay elaborates on that strategy, and demonstrates the moral selectivity
of the EU and the United States in political and moral posturing over the
claimed Armenian genocide.
The Genocide Convention of 1948 defines the crime as any of the following acts
committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical,
racial or religious group, as such:
1. Killing group members; 2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to group
members; 3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated
to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; 4. Imposing
measures intended to prevent births within the group; and, 5. Forcibly
transferring children of the group to another group.
The Convention also extends the crime of genocide to reach conspiracy, direct
and public incitement, and attempt to commit genocide, or complicity in the
same.
With regard to the claimed Armenian genocide, strong disproving evidence
can be summoned. The relocations and killings of Armenians were not based on
ethnicity, but on reasonable suspicions that they were aiding and aborting the
war enemies of the Ottoman Empire during World War I. Indeed, at the Versailles
Peace Conference, Armenians boasted of their treason to the Ottoman government
and military heroics for the World War I victors,
especially Russia and France. Moreover, tens of thousands of Armenians were left
undisturbed during the war in Istanbul, Izmir and elsewhere in non-military
sensitive zones, which shows that the Armenian relocation orders pivoted on
reasonable war necessities, not ethnicity, a fundamental element of genocide.
Additionally, Ottoman officials prosecuted and
punished more than 1,000 wayward soldiers for killings or abuses of Armenians.
Furthermore, a substantial number of Armenian massacres during the war were
retaliation for their massacres of Ottoman Muslims, not because of ethnicity or
religion. Moreover, there was no historical animosity of the Ottoman's toward
Armenians, who had climbed to peaks of official power and economic prosperity
within the Empire before the World War I. More could be said against the claimed
Armenian genocide, but the above sketch of contrary evidence enables a
comparison with the proof of genocide charges that could be asserted against EU
members and the United States. The following summarizes some of the genocide
indictments that might reasonably be brought against Turkey's detractors:
1. Germany
Germany committed genocide against the Herero tribe in then Southwest Africa
during its colonial occupation in the 1890s. The best evidence shows the Germans
slaughtered members of the tribe because they believed they were genetically and
mentally inferior. The tribe was not guilty of treason and not provoked the
German savagery by its own massacres of Germans. The butchery of the Hereros was
not during wartime when excesses are inevitable. Those who survived the initial
German genocide revolted against their brutal treatment with the Hoitentots in
1904, but were viciously destroyed with vastly superior arms or otherwise.
2. France
Substantial evidence implicates France in Algerian genocide during 1954-62 war
of independence in which more than 200,000 Muslims were slaughtered. Senior
French officers who fought in Algeria have recently confessed that torture and
summary executions were routine grisly instruments of French warfare. President
Chirac and Prime Minister Jospin, however, have fiercely opposed a parliamentary
inquiry into the genocide as exploring a subject best left to historians.
3. Belgium
Belgium is seemingly guilty of genocide during its gruesome colonization of
Belgian Congo under King Leopold II. The genocide spurred the legendary book by
Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness. The King deliberately inflicted on numerous
Congolese tribes conditions of calculated to bring about their physical
destruction in whole or in part. Belgium's ugly Congo genocide has been recently
chronicled in the book, King Leopold's Ghost.
4. Portugal
Portugal's apparent genocides uncurtained in Angola, Portuguese Guinea, and
Mozambique during colonial years. The Portuguese sold back tribal members as
slaves, and inflicted brutal conditions of slave and caused death to Angolan,
Guinean, and Mozambican tribes.
5. Spain
Spain seems implicated in the genocides of hundreds of Caribbean and Central and
South American peoples, like the Mexican Aztecs, and the genocide of Basques in
mainland Spain. Spanish killings and enslavements of indigenous tribes and
peoples are notorious, and stretched over centuries. Ditto for Spanish Basques
living on the border with France. Slavery was not ended in Cuba until Spain's
defeat in 1898 Spanish-American war. Spain may also have been guilty of genocide
in Spanish Morocco during its colonization.
6. Great Britain
The British apparently committed genocide of the Irish during the Great Potato
Famine, 1845-48. the Irish lost ½ their population from emigration provoked by
starvation conditions, and the British aggravated the starvation by callous
policies permitting the exports of foodstuffs from Ireland during the famine
calamity. The state of New York in the United States teaches the Potato Famine
as an example of genocide.
7. Austria
Austria is guilty of the Jewish Holocaust. The sole reason it escaped that
hideous stigma is because of Cold War politics after World War II when it was
occupied by the West and the Soviet Union until 1955.
8. Greece
Greece is guilty of genocide of Ottoman Muslims in Crete and of Turkish Cypriots
in Cyprus twice, 1963-64 and 1974. The evidence of genocide is voluminous,
including testimony from former U.S. Undersecretary of State George Ball and
foreign reporters on the scene.
9. Italy
Italy is guilty of genocide in Ethiopia and Somalia during its colonization and
war aggressions, and a co-inspirator in the Jewish Holocaust as an ally of
Hitler's Third Reich.
10. Netherlands
The Dutch seem indictable for genocide of Indonesian tribes during its long
colonial rule that ended only after World War II. The Dutch slaughtered and
subjugated indigenous populations for economic gain and a belief in their racial
and religious superiority.
11. United States
The United states is seemingly guilty of genocides of several Native American
Indian tribes and blacks during slavery. The Sand Creek massacre of helpless
Indian woman and children and General Phil Sheridan's fighting fighting creed
that only good Indian is a dead Indian exemplifies the former genocides. The
lethal conditions of black slavery captured in Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle
Tom's Cabin illustrates the latter genocide.
12. Australia and New Zealand
Neither country is a EU member, but both associated with its lofty ideology of
moral superiority, and were former colonies of Great Britain. Both under the
colonialism of the latter and during their early years of independence, these
twin nations committed genocides against Australian aboriginals and New Zealand
Maoris, respectively.
-- An Armenian and Muslim Tragedy? Yes !Genocide? No By Bruce Fein -
Subscribe to turkisharmenians | |
Powered by groups.yahoo.com |